Occupation Health Risks in Construction

Lechley Associates

Major construction projects can play a critical role in improving workers’ understanding of health risks and championing ‘universally high standards’ across the industry, new research suggests.

A three-year research project, funded by IOSH, aimed to explore the management of health, safety and wellbeing interventions on the Thames Tideway Tunnel project.


Members of the research team from Loughborough University were integrated into each of the construction teams working on the Tideway project and monitored key health and safety processes, personnel, documentation, events and activities.


In a paper titled ‘Raising the bar for occupational health management in construction, published in the Institution of Civil Engineers’ journal Civil Engineering, the research team highlights practical measures from the Tideway project to help stakeholders improve the management of health risks in construction.

The Loughborough team suggests major projects have an important role to play in upskilling the workforce, and that construction managers must take responsibility for health risk management, supported by skilled OSH and health professionals.


Interventions included working with occupational hygienists to improve understanding about health risks and how to manage them and coordinating training sessions for project managers, engineers, supervisors and others who contribute to risk assessments focusing on practical control measures.


Alistair Gibb, Professor of Construction Engineering Management at Loughborough University, said: “The construction industry faces many unique challenges when it comes to managing health risks and protecting workers. Across the industry there is poor understanding about the standards of health assessment which are legally required and low motivation among many employers to pay for health checks for workers who may soon move to other employers.

“Major projects such as Tideway are critical to developing universally high health management standards and are well-placed to champion good OH services and to use their expertise and influence to embed change within their own supply chains.


To achieve long-lasting improvements, these standards must be adopted throughout the sector, particularly within the SMEs which employ the majority of the workforce.”

The study suggests a consistent approach to occupational health management and health surveillance is needed across the construction industry with a commitment to improved portability of OH data.

The researchers also argue that health needs to be given higher visibility and clarity at prequalification and in tender documents.


Steve Hails, Director of Health, Safety and Wellbeing at Tideway, said: “Our commitment to transformational health, safety and wellbeing standards at Tideway is intended to set a new benchmark for the industry. Achieving parity between health and safety is a strategic objective for our programme and understanding the specific challenges emerging in the course of construction is imperative to our future direction.


“The support from IOSH and Loughborough University has been invaluable in identifying our progress. This unique approach to conducting a longitudinal study with skilled researchers embedded into our construction teams, has allowed us to compile legacy information in real time rather than, as has historically been the case, at the end of the project. This gives Tideway objective feedback during our works and informs our future direction.


“There are additional wider industry benefits for future projects to learn from our experiences through this approach and realising the benefits of industry working collaboratively with academia during the planning and construction phases of work.”


Mary Ogungbeje, Research Manager at IOSH, said: “This research goes a long way towards addressing what is a very prevalent and complex issue in the construction sector.


“For health to truly be treated like safety in construction there needs to be a shift in the perception and practices of employers and workers, and acceptance in industry that high standards should not be an exceptional practice but the necessary norm.


“The study highlights practical measures to help all stakeholders address barriers and improve the management of health risks in construction.”


An additional recommendation from the research includes further training for frontline workers, particularly to compensate for low visibility of health hazards including noise and respirable dust, and greater awareness of health conditions with long latency periods, including those caused by silica dust and asbestos exposure.


IOSH’s No Time to Lose campaign aims to explain the causes of occupational cancer and help businesses take action. Information about the dangers of silica dust, asbestos and other carcinogens and how to prevent exposure is available on the website: https://www.notimetolose.org.uk/


The paper, titled ‘Raising the bar for occupational health management in construction’ is published in the Institution of Civil Engineers journal Civil Engineering. The research is funded by the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). The paper is available here: https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/jcien.19.00029


In a second paper, published in the journal Safety Science, the research team explore in more detail the challenges to achieving lasting improvements to worker health in construction, this is available here: https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1ZWj63IVV9gluI


Alex Phillimore Communications Officer +44 (0)116 257 3254 / +44 (0)7980 004494


by Scott Lechley 31 March 2025
Finding the Right Recruiter for Your Business in 2025: A Strategic Guide for the New Recruitment Landscape 
by Shazamme System User 31 March 2025
Beyond the Placement: How Your Recruitment Partner Adds Strategic Value
by Scott Lechley 7 February 2025
The Ticking Time Bomb: Addressing the UK Construction Workforce Demographic Crisis 
UK Housing Market
by Scott Lechley 1 February 2025
The Bricks and Mortar of Discontent: Unravelling the UK's Housing Crisis "The UK’s listed housebuilders are on track to build the fewest new homes for sale in a decade, as planning rules and high mortgage rates hold the market back despite the new Labour government’s push to increase housing supply." (Construction sector, UK’s Listed Builders on Track to Build Fewest New Houses in a Decade) The UK faces a persistent and complex housing crisis. While successive governments have pledged to increase housing supply, the reality consistently falls short of ambition. The opening statement, "The UK’s listed housebuilders are on track to build the fewest new homes for sale in a decade, as planning rules and high mortgage rates hold the market back despite the new Labour government’s push to increase housing supply," encapsulates the multifaceted nature of this challenge. It highlights the critical interplay of planning regulations, economic factors, and governmental policy, all contributing to a slowdown in housebuilding. This essay will delve into these interconnected issues, exploring the complexities of the UK’s housing market and the obstacles hindering the construction of much-needed homes. One of the most significant constraints on housebuilding is the intricate and often cumbersome planning system. Obtaining planning permission can be lengthy and arduous, fraught with bureaucratic hurdles and local opposition. Developers often face significant delays, adding to costs and discouraging investment. This bottleneck in the planning system acts as a substantial impediment to increasing housing supply, regardless of government initiatives. Under pressure from residents concerned about overdevelopment and the impact on local infrastructure, local authorities often resist new housing projects. This "NIMBYism" (Not In My Back Yard) creates a significant obstacle, even when central government pushes for increased building targets. The result is a system where local concerns and bureaucratic red tape often thwart good intentions. Coupled with planning constraints, economic factors play a crucial role in shaping the housing market. High mortgage rates, as highlighted in the opening statement, significantly impact affordability and dampen demand. When borrowing becomes more expensive, potential homebuyers are less able to secure mortgages, reducing the number of people actively looking to purchase property. This, in turn, discourages developers from building new homes as the demand for their products decreases. Furthermore, economic uncertainty, such as that caused by inflation or recessionary fears, can further exacerbate the problem. Developers become more cautious and hesitant to invest in new projects with an uncertain economic outlook. This creates a vicious cycle, where high mortgage rates and economic instability lead to reduced demand and decreased housebuilding, ultimately contributing to the housing shortage. The role of government policy is also pivotal, albeit often paradoxical. While the current Labour government has strongly committed to increasing housing supply, as noted in the opening statement, translating this ambition into concrete results is proving challenging. As highlighted in the context of the Labour government’s housebuilding ambitions, the reliance on migrant workers to address the skills gap within the construction sector underscores the difficulty of achieving targets without a robust domestic workforce. This raises questions about the long-term sustainability of such an approach and the need for investment in training and skills development within the UK. The government's aim to ignite a "housebuilding boom" is laudable, but achieving it requires more than just political will. It necessitates a comprehensive strategy that addresses the underlying issues of planning constraints, economic factors, and skills shortages. The skills deficit within the construction industry presents another significant hurdle. The urgent need for 250,000 new workers to meet current project demands and an additional 159,000 to hit government targets, as highlighted in one document, illustrates the scale of the problem. The slow pace of training new workers under current models makes it difficult to bridge this gap. Without a sufficient workforce, construction projects will be delayed or even abandoned even if planning permission is granted and mortgage rates are favourable. This skills shortage acts as a bottleneck, restricting the industry's capacity to deliver the required number of homes. The government's initiatives to address this issue, such as the planned 5,000 new apprenticeships, are a step in the right direction. Still, more comprehensive reforms are needed to create a sustainable pipeline of skilled workers. The gap between policy ambitions and practical constraints is a recurring theme. The expectation that the housing sector will build significantly less than needed to meet Labour’s aim of 1.5 million homes over five years highlights this disconnect. It underscores the fact that simply setting ambitious targets is not enough. Achieving these targets requires a concerted effort to address the systemic challenges hindering housebuilding. This includes streamlining the planning process, creating a more stable economic environment, and investing in skills training to ensure a sufficient workforce. Without addressing these fundamental issues, government targets risk remaining just aspirations. Furthermore, the construction industry's challenges extend beyond housebuilding to infrastructure projects. As mentioned in one highlight, the anticipated increase in infrastructure delivery post-2024 faces similar constraints. The capacity to bring these projects to fruition is hampered by the economic and structural challenges affecting housebuilding. This interconnectedness between housing and infrastructure highlights the need for a holistic approach to addressing the construction sector's challenges. A piecemeal approach, focusing solely on housing or infrastructure in isolation, is unlikely to be effective.  In conclusion, the UK’s housing crisis is a complex issue with no easy solutions. The interplay of planning regulations, economic factors, skills shortages, and government policy creates a challenging environment for housebuilders. While the government's stated aim of increasing housing supply is commendable, achieving this goal requires more than just setting targets. It necessitates a fundamental planning system reform, a focus on creating a stable economic environment conducive to investment, and a commitment to developing a skilled workforce within the construction industry. Until these underlying issues are addressed, the UK will continue grappling with a housing crisis with far-reaching social and economic consequences. The bricks and mortar of new homes are not just physical structures; they represent opportunity, security, and the foundation for a thriving society. Unlocking the potential of the housing market requires a concerted and coordinated effort from all stakeholders, ensuring that the ambition to build a better future is not just a dream but a tangible reality.