How will the Russia-Ukraine war increase costs of UK construction projects?

Lechley Associates

Henry Clarke, construction partner at Spencer West, explores how the Russa-Ukraine conflict will have a noticeable impact on the costs of UK construction projects, due to fuel inflation

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has resulted in increased sanctions against Russia and exposed the vulnerability of the European continent’s fossil fuel supplies, but how will increasing fuel costs impact construction projects here in the UK?


Up to 43% of the EU’s oil comes from the Russian Federation, along with up to 25% of its oil. The medium to long term nature of the conflict in Ukraine, and related sanctions means fossil fuel supply and its vulnerability will be an issue for the construction industry for some time.


High fuel prices may be a stimulus to at least non-OPEC oil and gas production, but perhaps not generate enough additional oil and gas flow from existing non-OPEC sources to reduce prices to pre-invasion levels. This means energy costs in producing construction materials and for direct use in transport and on construction projects may remain high generating an inflationary trend within construction.

Impact of increasing fuel costs



What does that mean for construction projects from a contractor perspective?

The attractions of off-site construction become stronger if contractors can demonstrate they can manufacture units more cost-effectively off-site with resultant fewer vehicle journeys to and from site or around the site compared to traditional construction (and with more efficient use of labour). A realisation of this attraction would mean a wider prevalence of contracts with such suppliers on projects.


The combination of high energy prices, increased recognition of the environmental impact of fossil fuels and their security vulnerability and the national security risk of reliance on oil and gas will encourage an increase and acceleration of the construction of renewable and alternative energy projects to wean the UK off such fuels.


Some proposed projects will be shelved as the finances become less certain or not profitable as costs rise. The property market may become subdued as the public and the business community assesses the economic impact of the Ukrainian conflict. In future, such shelved projects may raise planning issue renewal issues and perhaps disputes between successive landowners over the interpretation of overage clauses if such projects are started later.


New projects that do go ahead will have liquidated damages clauses that contractors should carefully assess to ensure they are realistic pre-estimates of loss in the current environment and a liability that they can accept. Contractors will place greater preference on the use of fluctuation clauses. The fluctuations clauses in these contracts should be carefully reviewed by contractors to allow for price rises in an inflationary environment so the risk of the inflationary impact of the Ukrainian conflict is passed on to the employer.



Cost-based issues for contractors


Existing projects will have had their financial models dented with rising costs. This will lead to a range of cost-based issues for the parties to tackle in what is a traditionally adversarial industry.


In particular, contractors making a loss on a project will be carefully considering the nature of the loss that is recoverable under their contracts, thereby testing the interpretation of ‘direct loss’ at law.


Contractors will also check fluctuation clauses for the same reasons as for new projects.


Contractors will focus on properly documenting loss or increased costs to ensure any claims stand a good chance of success in negotiations or at later stages of dispute resolution; and should check their project management processes and procurement processes as the timing of the ordering of supplies or services and thus fixing their pricing will impact the costs of projects and the grounds for claim by contractors.


If the Ukrainian conflict causes a bulge of construction industry claims because of rising costs, then the litigation funding industry may also focus on innovating the financing of such claims. Look out for new product offers from such providers.



The Ukrainian conflict has reinforced competitive pressures in the UK construction market. It is a market in which well-managed contractors with good project management skills, an appreciation of risk management and an openness to innovation and investment in training are likely to succeed and thus not have to rely as much on the points set out above. Nevertheless, all contractors should consider these issues as part of their project management cycle.


by Scott Lechley 31 March 2025
Finding the Right Recruiter for Your Business in 2025: A Strategic Guide for the New Recruitment Landscape 
by Shazamme System User 31 March 2025
Beyond the Placement: How Your Recruitment Partner Adds Strategic Value
by Scott Lechley 7 February 2025
The Ticking Time Bomb: Addressing the UK Construction Workforce Demographic Crisis 
UK Housing Market
by Scott Lechley 1 February 2025
The Bricks and Mortar of Discontent: Unravelling the UK's Housing Crisis "The UK’s listed housebuilders are on track to build the fewest new homes for sale in a decade, as planning rules and high mortgage rates hold the market back despite the new Labour government’s push to increase housing supply." (Construction sector, UK’s Listed Builders on Track to Build Fewest New Houses in a Decade) The UK faces a persistent and complex housing crisis. While successive governments have pledged to increase housing supply, the reality consistently falls short of ambition. The opening statement, "The UK’s listed housebuilders are on track to build the fewest new homes for sale in a decade, as planning rules and high mortgage rates hold the market back despite the new Labour government’s push to increase housing supply," encapsulates the multifaceted nature of this challenge. It highlights the critical interplay of planning regulations, economic factors, and governmental policy, all contributing to a slowdown in housebuilding. This essay will delve into these interconnected issues, exploring the complexities of the UK’s housing market and the obstacles hindering the construction of much-needed homes. One of the most significant constraints on housebuilding is the intricate and often cumbersome planning system. Obtaining planning permission can be lengthy and arduous, fraught with bureaucratic hurdles and local opposition. Developers often face significant delays, adding to costs and discouraging investment. This bottleneck in the planning system acts as a substantial impediment to increasing housing supply, regardless of government initiatives. Under pressure from residents concerned about overdevelopment and the impact on local infrastructure, local authorities often resist new housing projects. This "NIMBYism" (Not In My Back Yard) creates a significant obstacle, even when central government pushes for increased building targets. The result is a system where local concerns and bureaucratic red tape often thwart good intentions. Coupled with planning constraints, economic factors play a crucial role in shaping the housing market. High mortgage rates, as highlighted in the opening statement, significantly impact affordability and dampen demand. When borrowing becomes more expensive, potential homebuyers are less able to secure mortgages, reducing the number of people actively looking to purchase property. This, in turn, discourages developers from building new homes as the demand for their products decreases. Furthermore, economic uncertainty, such as that caused by inflation or recessionary fears, can further exacerbate the problem. Developers become more cautious and hesitant to invest in new projects with an uncertain economic outlook. This creates a vicious cycle, where high mortgage rates and economic instability lead to reduced demand and decreased housebuilding, ultimately contributing to the housing shortage. The role of government policy is also pivotal, albeit often paradoxical. While the current Labour government has strongly committed to increasing housing supply, as noted in the opening statement, translating this ambition into concrete results is proving challenging. As highlighted in the context of the Labour government’s housebuilding ambitions, the reliance on migrant workers to address the skills gap within the construction sector underscores the difficulty of achieving targets without a robust domestic workforce. This raises questions about the long-term sustainability of such an approach and the need for investment in training and skills development within the UK. The government's aim to ignite a "housebuilding boom" is laudable, but achieving it requires more than just political will. It necessitates a comprehensive strategy that addresses the underlying issues of planning constraints, economic factors, and skills shortages. The skills deficit within the construction industry presents another significant hurdle. The urgent need for 250,000 new workers to meet current project demands and an additional 159,000 to hit government targets, as highlighted in one document, illustrates the scale of the problem. The slow pace of training new workers under current models makes it difficult to bridge this gap. Without a sufficient workforce, construction projects will be delayed or even abandoned even if planning permission is granted and mortgage rates are favourable. This skills shortage acts as a bottleneck, restricting the industry's capacity to deliver the required number of homes. The government's initiatives to address this issue, such as the planned 5,000 new apprenticeships, are a step in the right direction. Still, more comprehensive reforms are needed to create a sustainable pipeline of skilled workers. The gap between policy ambitions and practical constraints is a recurring theme. The expectation that the housing sector will build significantly less than needed to meet Labour’s aim of 1.5 million homes over five years highlights this disconnect. It underscores the fact that simply setting ambitious targets is not enough. Achieving these targets requires a concerted effort to address the systemic challenges hindering housebuilding. This includes streamlining the planning process, creating a more stable economic environment, and investing in skills training to ensure a sufficient workforce. Without addressing these fundamental issues, government targets risk remaining just aspirations. Furthermore, the construction industry's challenges extend beyond housebuilding to infrastructure projects. As mentioned in one highlight, the anticipated increase in infrastructure delivery post-2024 faces similar constraints. The capacity to bring these projects to fruition is hampered by the economic and structural challenges affecting housebuilding. This interconnectedness between housing and infrastructure highlights the need for a holistic approach to addressing the construction sector's challenges. A piecemeal approach, focusing solely on housing or infrastructure in isolation, is unlikely to be effective.  In conclusion, the UK’s housing crisis is a complex issue with no easy solutions. The interplay of planning regulations, economic factors, skills shortages, and government policy creates a challenging environment for housebuilders. While the government's stated aim of increasing housing supply is commendable, achieving this goal requires more than just setting targets. It necessitates a fundamental planning system reform, a focus on creating a stable economic environment conducive to investment, and a commitment to developing a skilled workforce within the construction industry. Until these underlying issues are addressed, the UK will continue grappling with a housing crisis with far-reaching social and economic consequences. The bricks and mortar of new homes are not just physical structures; they represent opportunity, security, and the foundation for a thriving society. Unlocking the potential of the housing market requires a concerted and coordinated effort from all stakeholders, ensuring that the ambition to build a better future is not just a dream but a tangible reality.