Get the next issue
This was one week's Brief. The next lands in your inbox on Saturday morning, free, with an unsubscribe link in every issue.

The CPA splits the market in two, the Budget's slow lever, Mace's £62m loss and reshuffle, and a pool for the people the big schemes could not take.

The question comes first again this week. It belongs to the economics students I briefed at Lancaster on Friday as much as to me, and some of you will know the answer before they do.
This week's question: how many people does UK construction actually need to recruit over the next five years? The CITB says 206,000 extra workers by 2030. The Trade Skills Index says 937,000 recruits by 2032. The same industry quotes both, often in the same speech.
About 200,000, the CITB numberAround half a millionClose to a millionNobody knows, and that is the problem
Vote with one tap, and read my take on Friday: community.lechley.com/question. The five questions the students are working on are further down.
Last week I asked who you call when you hit a problem you cannot take to your board. Seventy of you tapped the first option, the former boss or mentor who takes the call for nothing. The next most popular answer got twenty-three. The paid adviser who already knows the business came last, which is the gap the two conversations behind the question described. I will come back to it on the question page once I have read the replies.
On Wednesday I spent two hours with the first of those two on the idea I mentioned last week. It is further on than it was. That is all I will say for now.
On Tuesday, the day before the Budget, I spoke to the group managing director of a northern housebuilder I have known for years. They were sitting tight until the Chancellor had spoken, and the picture was blunt. On a good site they make 20 per cent gross. It used to be 30 plus, and a generation ago it was 50. The HBF's number is that £65,000 to £70,000 has gone onto the cost of building a house since 2020, with next to no movement in what it sells for. A site needs 0.65 to 0.7 sales a week to carry its prelims and its sales office; some are doing twenty a year, and that is what bleeds a builder dry. Offsite manufacture is "far too expensive" when there is no headroom for another pound of build cost, and a housebuilder works to a sales programme, not a build programme. Trades are not the problem, because the industry is building at half what it should; they become the problem the day anyone tries for 300,000 homes. On the new equity loan: one or two extra sales a week at best, nothing like the old Help to Buy, with mortgage rates still starting with a six. That is the ground the CPA forecast stands on.
The same afternoon, a leader who works across offsite manufacture and devolution landed on the point the Budget made the next day: the mayors are starting to talk to each other, and there is appetite for one person to advise several combined authorities at once on modern methods and social housing. That role does not exist yet. I think it will.
On the desk, first interviews ran on a Construction Manager appointment for a major Manchester heritage scheme, the shortlist for an Operations Director at the UK arm of an Irish contractor went to the client, and on Friday morning I briefed the economics student groups at Lancaster University who have taken on five questions about the industry's training gap. The questions are further down, because some of you will know the answers before they do.
The market observation is the two numbers that opened this issue. Tuesday's CPA forecast and Wednesday's Budget point the same way: housing down, infrastructure up, and a market that is no longer one market. I wrote up what the Budget did not answer, which is who delivers any of it, on the community on Friday; the link is in the Budget item below.
Five questions about the training gap, and a room full of economists to answer them. On Friday I briefed the BSc Economics project groups at Lancaster University, alongside the chief executive of ProAge, on a company project that runs through to the spring. The hypothesis is one most of you have lived: every downturn, the industry cuts its training intake first, the cohort that was never trained does not come back, and it reappears ten years later as a shortage of experienced people. Each group has one question to answer with a chart and a yes or no. Does training intake fall faster than employment in a downturn, in 2008 to 2011 and again in 2020? Is there a visible dip today in the number of workers aged roughly 33 to 40, the people who would have entered in 2008 to 2012? Where does the industry's "900,000" figure come from, and which number is right, when the CITB says 206,000 by 2030 and the Trade Skills Index says 937,000 by 2032? Which occupations carry the biggest gap relative to their size: the big headline trades, or the scaffolders, roofers, site managers and estimators that hold everything else up? And if the pattern holds, when does the next gap open, given the intake dips of 2020 and 2022?
That is where the question at the top comes from. If you have the data behind your answer, reply and I will pass it to the groups.
308 senior roles are open across the contractors and clients on my watchlist, director level and above, and twenty of them have been open for 98 days or more. Mace Construct holds 100, Balfour Beatty 41, then HS2, Wates, Kier, NG Bailey and Taylor Wimpey. The stuck ones are the useful ones: Balfour Beatty has posted the same Project Commercial Director brief four separate times, and Mace has three versions of an Operations Director brief at the same stage. A role that will not close after three months is rarely a sourcing problem. It is the brief, the money or the process, and a firm in that position is far more open to a direct approach than the advert suggests. The full count, with this week's new briefs in Birmingham, Belfast, Manchester and Liverpool, is on the community.
One more on where the next job comes from. An application this week for one of my data centre roles in Portugal reached me because the applicant asked ChatGPT where to look, and it sent them to lechley.com. If your company's roles sit on a job board behind a login, the assistants cannot see them, and neither can the growing number of people who ask them first.
Published this week, from the news desk and the Monday count:
A pool for the people the big schemes could not take. The big schemes turn away far more good apprentice and graduate applicants than they take; one water company told me this month it is fifteen to one. The Lechley Community now has a pool for them: the applicant writes their own record, approved employers see it without a name, and a yes from the applicant is the only thing that shares it. Free, removable any time. I offered it first to Anglian Water, as somewhere to send the applicants it could not place. On Friday they said no: enough internal initiatives already this year, happy to revisit later. Fair enough, and the door stays open. So the pool opens to every other employer first, and the Lancaster economists above are studying exactly these people, the near misses who leave the industry before they have joined it. Employers who want in, or who want the regret-email paragraph to send people there: community.lechley.com/pool/employers.
All of it free at community.lechley.com.
Read the operating line, not the headline. Four sets of accounts crossed my desk this month: Arup, Farrans, Mace Construct and, on Thursday, Jones Bros, whose revenue rose 55% to £232.8m on water and renewables work with headcount up from 479 to 527. Before an interview or an approach, pull the accounts from Companies House, which is free, and read three things: which way revenue is going, operating profit before exceptional items, and the note that explains the exceptionals. Mace's £62m loss is a £6.5m operating profit once £60m of separation costs come out. Farrans' £36m loss was legacy contracts cleared in one go after a change of owner. The headline tells you what happened. The operating line tells you whether to join.
An established Irish contractor has retained me to appoint an Operations Director for its UK business, based in the Thames Valley. The shortlist went to the client this week and face to face interviews follow, and the London Project Director search from last week stays live. Alongside it, Europe's dedicated data centre delivery partner, with more than 500 MW in flight, has a run of senior roles open across Dublin, Milan and Portugal, from Project Leads to EHS and digital transformation. The briefs are at lechley.com/jobs.

This was one week's Brief. The next lands in your inbox on Saturday morning, free, with an unsubscribe link in every issue.

The latest from the Brief. Every past issue is in the archive.
