Get the next issue
This was one Monday's Brief. The next lands in your inbox at the start of the week, free, with an unsubscribe link in every issue.

Contract awards more than doubled in August while starts fell, the Building Safety Levy went live, and Crest Nicholson's lenders bought more time.

A split week: contractors with the right specialism kept winning work, while the housebuilders kept paying for the last two years.
This week's question: if your firm announced a restructure tomorrow, what would you do first?
Vote with one tap, and read my take on Friday: community.lechley.com/question
I spent Tuesday and Wednesday at UK Construction Week at the NEC in Birmingham. It was a very interesting two days, and I met some fantastic people. I learnt a lot about procurement and what it means for the industry: how clients can improve the way they buy, and the effect that would have on the supply chain as a whole. More on that below. If we met there, thank you for your time.
The Operations Manager UK search for an international data centre contractor moved on this week. Two leaders are now in front of the client, out of more than fifty people mapped. On a role like this the hard test is not the size of the schemes someone has run, it is how many they have held at once, and that is a short list.
This week split the construction market in two. Contractors with the right specialism, water, defence, high voltage grid work, won solid new contracts: Lagan on RAF Waddington, Costain at South Kensington, Barhale for Anglian Water. At the same time Crest Nicholson and Vistry posted heavy losses, and two more subcontractors, Torsion Projects and Avtar Construction, went under. If you are inside a stressed housebuilder, do not wait for certainty that is not coming. If you are weighing a move, look at who is actually winning work, not who is making headlines for losing it. Full breakdown in this week's roundup: Contracts land, housebuilders bleed, subbies keep folding.
The best session I sat in on at the NEC came down to one question: what makes a framework any good? The panel's answer was that a framework is an investment decision, not just a list of names. A good one has a real supply chain behind it, pricing terms that work, viability and sustainability for the firms on it, and a long-term relationship rather than a one-off transaction. It starts with proper market engagement, and it pays the supply chain fairly and consistently.
Two live examples came up. The Ministry of Justice's programme for 20,000 new prison places runs as an alliance with Kier, Laing O'Rourke and Wates, built around MMC, with predictability of cost and local employment as stated aims. The New Hospital Programme earned a notable mention too, for the work it is doing on MMC: a standard hospital design and set of components, rather than designing every hospital from scratch. And NISTA now publishes the government's infrastructure pipeline as a list anyone can download, so the supply chain can see what is coming instead of guessing. Early supply chain involvement, and not locking SMEs out, came up more than once.
The uncomfortable question was whether there are too many frameworks. The panel's answer was yes. Clients need to be more specific about what they are buying, and there was a pointed question about why not every NHS client uses the frameworks that meet the Construction Playbook and David Mosey's Gold Standard, the 24 recommendations he set out in 2022.
The panel's three takeaways:
For anyone in a bid, commercial or procurement role, this is where the work is heading. The people clients will compete for are the ones who can run early engagement and hold a supply chain together over years, not just win the tender.
Last week I asked who taught you the most in your first five years. The answers point one way: most people did not learn the job from the person they reported to. They learned it from whoever let them watch: the site manager who walked them round the job at seven in the morning, the senior QS who let them sit in on a final account meeting, the foreman who explained why the drawing was wrong. Read the result and my take at community.lechley.com/question.
That is the idea behind the Exchange: three things you could teach someone from a different generation in construction, three things you would like to learn, and half an hour on a call with someone whose answers fit yours. If the most useful lessons rarely come through the org chart, it is worth building a route for them that does not depend on luck.
The community site changed shape this week. It now has two front doors, depending on where you are in your career.
All of it free at community.lechley.com.
When you weigh a move, ask what share of the order book is actually on site, not just how big it is. August's awards were up 120% while starts fell 28%. An order book that has not broken ground is a promise, not a workload, and the answer tells you whether you are joining to deliver or joining to wait.
Week five of the Operations Manager UK appointment for an international main contractor delivering data centres for hyperscale clients. The role reports to the UK Managing Director, leads Project Directors across three to five schemes nationally, and grows with a secured pipeline heading towards £300m to £400m a year. Retained exclusively with Lechley. Two leaders are with the client, and there is still room for the right person. If you have run multi-project mission-critical delivery in the UK, or you know who has, I would value the conversation.

This was one Monday's Brief. The next lands in your inbox at the start of the week, free, with an unsubscribe link in every issue.

The latest from the Brief. Every past issue is in the archive.
